[Extra Innings]

Its a marathon not a sprint

[Rich Boy]

And the screwjob is complete

[homosayswhat]

yea....and folks bet on them....that is even more mind boggling...

you have to think with the millions that play baseball...this is the best a team can field....

Jack Crust...batting near .200.. freaking ridiculous...

[jeffdane]

Depends on the odds you got I suppose. Like I say getting the best odds is half the battle. I know they won two in a row and one of them closed at least +200, and the other one was maybe +190 at close but opened over +200. But it was awhile ago so I dont know for sure. But they have had at least half a dozen games over +150. Not counting those two. That is easy enough to look up just on generic closers.

I could run the database and get all of the info but it doesnt matter since it is a non issue.

But I would bet money they are up more than half a unit as dogs. I would say closer to 5 units. Hell go over to Covers and count their wins and losses and you would see that just with random numbers and results.

since your guessing, ill just leave it alone. but you are wrong.

[homosayswhat]

Suzuki is your only hope....cause he will bat with no one on and two outs FOR SURE!

[pokernut9999]

Papplebum will give up at least one run.

[homosayswhat]

foul ball

[Rich Boy]

A chance to drive in a run, the Mariners are horrible in this spot.

[crustyme]

why back a team with 14 consecutive losses?

kid is clueless.

[ZetaPsi808]

wow mariners are horrible. how do u have bases loaded no outs an then do not score a run.

[spankie]

[homosayswhat]

yea...betting on the Ms is ridiculous....

that was an easy win from the start for the Soxs....way overmatched

[LockPickMaster]

Why would you take the M's +1.5

[ZetaPsi808]

bookies needed mariners here

[wantitall4moi]

since your guessing, ill just leave it alone. but you are wrong.

OK so I looked it up.

Dogs 30-39 as dogs and 44-25 on the +1.5 RL

Nationals as dogs are +193 On.

with the +1.5 RL theyre +493 On.

So with the +1.5 RL theyre 3 unit more profitable. So I was wrong I guess, but seriously 15 more wins and you only get 3 more units?

I did the mariners for shits and giggles. Since I started up the DB.

19-33 as dogs. 29-23 with the +1.5 RL

Dogs on theyre -908

RL on theyre -808

So a loser either way, you just happen to lose 1 unit less if you bet them on the +1.5 RL, but with a gain of 10 winners another questionable approach.

I took a .500 team the Mets and as a dog theyre 30-32 with a +758 (per 100 bet) on the ML, on the +1.5 Rl theyre 36-26 and -335. So thats almost an 11 unit difference.

[rm18]

Time to chase the Mariners? No way they can lose 20 in a row.

[wantitall4moi]

Oh and the odds. On May 10 they got to +205. Closed +185/190. On May 11 they got to +195. I was going from memory so sue me. I knew they had 2 days in arow they won that they got to +200 and won. Although they got to only 195 on one of those days.

[Extra Innings]

Time to chase the Mariners? No way they can lose 20 in a row.

[ApricotSinner32]

OK so I looked it up.

Dogs 30-39 as dogs and 44-25 on the +1.5 RL

Nationals as dogs are +193 On.

with the +1.5 RL theyre +493 On.

So with the +1.5 RL theyre 3 unit more profitable. So I was wrong I guess, but seriously 15 more wins and you only get 3 more units?

I did the mariners for shits and giggles. Since I started up the DB.

19-33 as dogs. 29-23 with the +1.5 RL

Dogs on theyre -908

RL on theyre -808

So a loser either way, you just happen to lose 1 unit less if you bet them on the +1.5 RL, but with a gain of 10 winners another questionable approach.

I took a .500 team the Mets and as a dog theyre 30-32 with a +758 (per 100 bet) on the ML, on the +1.5 Rl theyre 36-26 and -335. So thats almost an 11 unit difference.

This is assuming that I am blindly playing the mariners on the rl. These stats don't mean anything unless this is the case. Another idiotic post.