 SBR Top-Rated Sportsbooks |
Best Sportsbooks List
|
|
| |||||
| #1 FanDuel | SBR rating 4.8/5 | Review | #6 BetRivers | SBR rating 4.1/5 | Review | #2 Caesars | SBR rating 4.7/5 | Review | #7 Fanatics | SBR rating 4.1/5 | Review |
| #3 DraftKings | SBR rating 4.7/5 | Review | #8 Betway | SBR rating 3.8/5 | Review | ||
| #4 BetMGM | SBR rating 4.6/5 | Review | #9 Borgata | SBR rating 3.5/5 | Review | ||
| #5 bet365 | SBR rating 4.6/5 | Review | #10 ClutchBet | SBR rating 2.9/5 | Review | ||
It's fine. Had I read it sooner I would have also replied sooner.
I have not yet made any bets today, and I didn't find a clear edge on any of those lines. I liked Isner's odds the most but he ended up losing, and I, just like most everyone, did not expect Wawrinka to play this poorly.
Haider-Maurer @ 55 – 2 units
That should prove sufficiently likely to perpetuate this streak of mine...
Mcgee @ 2.82 – 5 units
Dulgheru @ 4 – 5 units
Nice hit my man!
In all fairness though I really cannot be given any credit for fading Doucharde. I'll feel bad counting it towards the thread record...
Olivo @ 5.5 – 2 units
Gulbis and Bouchard 2 easiest/most profitable fades in tennis at the moment.
Errani @ 4.8 – 2 units
Kohlschreiber @ 5.9 – 2 units
Andujar @ 2.7 – 5 units
Halep 2-1 @ 4.3 – 2 units
Andujar @ 7.6 – 3 units
Lucky. Unfortunately a late post due to a ridiculous odds drift from @ 6.6 within a quarter of an hour, but you could get him @20+ down three games to love early in 1:st.
Fratangelo 2-1 @ 7.2 – 2 units
Brengle @ 5.1 – 4 units
C Smith @ 3.3 – 3 units
Nedovyesov @ 2.06 – 5 units
Trinker @ 4.6 – 3 units
Estrella-Burgos @ 2.74 – 3 units
The ageless wonder. This dude wasn't even good in his prime, now he's knocking down top 20 players left and right at 35.Originally Posted by Hardcoar
Indeed. It's funny how things happen sometimes (which feels like often because you only notice the extraordinary)...
Nice call man.
Giorgi 2-1 @ 4.5 – 4 units
Rosol @ evens – 5 units
I can see that you base your predictions on watching matches and developing an idea of what to expect on future performances. To do this as well as you do, it is obvious that you need a lot of experience combined the talent to differenciate what’s relevant from what isn’t. It would be very interesting to know if you think if it is sometimes enough to watch just a part of a match, if you watch more than one match simultaniously and if you find youtube highlights useful for your research. I would understand that you would prefer to let a girl find their her way to success or failure on her own but this could be helpful.
I do watch a lot of tennis, not least because I enjoy it. There are few things more satisfying to me than watching an extremely good match. I don't watch anywhere near all of the matches I bet on (or their predecessors, rather), though – even if there were streams available.
I maintain (like I always have), that a lot of my decision-making process is based on impressions of the given bet's value, which in turn certainly depends on tangibles to one degree or another. I always thoroughly look at recent results and surface statistics.
1. I absolutely think it's enough to watch only part of a match. It's a lot better than having watched nothing.
2. I switch between matches a lot, but don't usually watch matches simultaneously.
3. Not really. See point no. 1 above. I normally only watch highlights for my enjoyment if the match is particularly good.
Also: There are no girls on the internet.
Tomic 2-1 @ 4.5 – 3 units
Thank you for your reply.
There are girls, this is a tangible, I'm just not one of them, correct.
intangible girls are like decafeinated coffee...at least to we few openly-heterosexual males in this world
Last edited by fitguy67; 04-29-15 at 10:43 PM.
Rosol @ 9.2 – 3 units
Cuevas @ 3 – 5 units
Lucic-Baroni @ 3.6 – 4 units
Badosa Gibert @ 5.4 – 4 units
Reply With Quote