Originally Posted by
luctens
Well if a bookmaker says the bonus is unlimited then what do you think some players are going to do? Use it to the max of course. And who decides what is defined as "abusing the system"? The bonus said unlimited and the guy was doing as many deposits as possible to take advantage of an unlimited bonus, it was all under his account and nobody else's, and everything he was doing was as per the terms and conditions, so that's in no way "bonus abuse" whatsoever. The only way it would have been that the player would be in the wrong is if it was a situation similar to if for example if it was a one-time offer and he was doing deposits from other accounts in other people's names in order to take advantage of the bonus more than once when he was only entitled to it once himself, if he was doing something like that then it would be against the terms of the promotion, but what the player did wasn't against the terms of the promotion at all. It said that you could deposit from your account an unlimited amount of times and all of those deposits would qualify for the promotion, and that's what he did, and there absolutely nothing wrong with that at all.
The simple thing is that if Bovada only wanted players to take the bonus for $2k or whatever, just offer a one-time 100% up to $2k bonus, or just offer the 100% up to $250 but only make it valid for eight $250 deposits after which the bonus ends for that player. They did nothing of the sort, so they opened themselves up to players making an unlimited amount of deposits, as per the terms of the promotion that Bovada wrote themselves.
If they don't like players doing that, then they shouldn't have wrote the terms the way they wrote them. It is stupid for any bookmaker to say that a bonus has been "taken advantage of", when the player didn't break any rules at all. The bookmaker holds all the aces and decides the terms of the promotion for goodness sake, so if a player proceeds to go with that promotion to the letter of those terms, then they shouldn't be penalised whatsoever, it's as simple as that.
There is absolutely nothing wrong whatsoever with the player simply playing by the rules, of which those rules were clearly set out by the bookmaker themselves in the first place for goodness sake, so if the bookmaker didn't like the way they wrote the rules, then it's the bookmaker's fault for not writing the terms of the promotion the way they would have liked them, and the player is not at any fault whatsoever as all the player has done is simply complied with the terms of the promotion that the bookmaker has put in front of them.