1. #1
    innovation
    innovation's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 01-27-12
    Posts: 6,218
    Betpoints: 239

    California cell phone kill switch.

    The Government Can Kill Your Smartphone
    California thinks a "kill switch" on your smartphone will protect you. Here's why you should be terrified.
    Bill Bonner tells you how modern digital money leaves you vulnerable to the worst types of disasters.

    Most Californians probably think their government was looking out for them when it passed SB962. The legislation requires phone manufacturers to install a "kill switch" in all smartphones sold in the state. The politicians will tell you they're trying to make stealing phones less attractive, since they can remotely shut down them, making them worthless.


    At least that's what they're saying when the cameras are rolling, and when people aren't paying attention.


    There's a dangerous consequence to installing this supposed safeguard. On the surface, it sounds like a way to deter thieves. But really, it just gives the government another way to shut down communication and control their citizens.


    If you need proof, think about what would happen if the police in Ferguson had access to a smartphone kill switch.


    In the beginning, they did everything they could to stop you from learning what was happening on the ground. They banned helicopters from reporting from the sky. Grounded all drones that had the ability to record. And they've cracked down on any news reporters or journalists they've come across.


    In fact, most of the footage you seeing coming from these ongoing protests are from smartphones. The very smartphones that can be turned off if the people in charge think its necessary.


    Unfortunately, no one will hear this story. When they talk about kill switches, they'll tell you about the rise of cellphone thefts over the past ten years. They'll cite how much an iPhone sells on the black market. And they'll make you terrified to ever take your eyes off your device.


    They're hoping you take your eyes off the real danger.


    What's the big deal, you're probably saying. After all, only Californians have to worry about it. They made their bed by electing the politicians who passed the bill. Now they have to sleep in it.


    If only that were the case.


    You see, California just so happens to be the largest phone market in the country, which makes sense since they have the largest population. So a law passed in the state has more influence than a law passed in a state like... Wyoming.


    What does this mean? Well, if phone manufacturers are going to change their design so they can do business in California, they're going to wind up selling those kill switch phones in the other 49 states. So how long before other state government follow the Golden State's example and pass kill switch legislation of their own?


    Who wants to bet Missouri is one of the first states to follow their lead?


    Things are bad in the U.S., but you don't need us to remind you of that. And the only thing that could possibly be worse... is how bad things can get in the future. Today's article by Agora Publishing president and CEO Bill Bonner attempts to give you a glimpse of that.


    The money you use today isn't like the money you might have used when you were a kid. When the Fed pumps trillions of dollars into the economy, they don't have to worry about turning on a printing press. Everything's digital now.


    And that's why the country is so vulnerable...


    [Ed. note: There's a lot of potential disasters out there that could put you and your family at risk, so having a plan in place might not be a bad idea. But before you start hoarding canned foods buying a bug-out-bag, you should know they won't protect you from one particular danger. And it's a disaster that could happen any day now. Click here to learn what it is, and what you can do to protect yourself.]
    One More Reason to Dislike Obama

    If you’re not happy with the Obama administration, this might make you furious… especially if you’ve been struggling to make money from your investments.

    Because the truth is Obama’s Treasury Department has been collecting a series of massive payouts over the last five years.

    In total, it has already collected $9.2 billion, all thanks to a little-known investment strategy.

    Click here for the stunning details.
    The End of Money



    Bill Bonner
    Here in France, the weather has turned bad. It is rainy and cold, with the temperature below 60 degrees. Our thoughts turn gloomy… we give the cat some extra food.


    "It seems to be happening all over the whole world," said a friend. "The climate is changing. Here in this part of France, it used to be reliably sunny and warm in the summertime. Now, you never know what you'll get."


    Some people believe the "global warming" hypothesis. Others are convinced the globe is cooling.


    "Yes, that is what is really going on," says another friend. "The Earth's climate has little to do with carbon emissions. They are just a drop in the ocean, from a climate point of view.


    "What really matters is the sun. I'm greatly simplifying, but when the sun's radiant heat is strong, the world warms. When it is weak, it cools. We've been in a warm period. Now, we're entering a weak period.


    "It's not global warming you have to worry about. It's global cooling. And it will be a catastrophe much greater than the financial catastrophe caused by Janet Yellen and the Fed."


    Disaster Connoisseur


    Today, south of the Loire River, in the summer of 2014, it looks as though he may be right. So, we turn away from the looming manmade disaster caused by the feds… to the looming natural disaster caused by the sun. And to disasters generally.


    As longtime readers know, we are connoisseurs of disaster. Just as some people have a palate for wine, we have a keen nose for disaster.


    Yes, we are the Robert Parker of catastrophe. We have sampled hundreds of varieties. We roll them around in our brain and pick out the subtle differences. We remember the little nuances. We can smell one coming a mile away.


    Will "global warming" cause a major disaster? Maybe. But what interests us most is the following thought:

    "There are an infinite number of known unknowns and unknown unknowns -- any one of which could cause a disaster."

    In many ways, we are more vulnerable to a disaster than at any time in human history.

    "It was a political and military disaster. It was a social upheaval. But it did not cause millions of civilian deaths. Because 70% of the French still lived on farms, they had a safety net that worked."
    What might cause a major disaster? Weather… war… disease… famine -- the horsemen of the Apocalypse are still with us.


    But now we have iPhones instead of the horse and plow…


    No Safety Net


    Imagine a few years of colder-than-usual summers in the Northern Hemisphere and droughts in Australia and South America -- the only substantial food producers south of the equator.


    This could easily reduce the world's food output by 10%. Stocks would quickly be drawn down to the point where there was nothing left.


    What would people eat?


    And here we turn our attention to the obvious: There are many more people around than there used to be.


    The last major disaster happened in France in 1940. The Nazis invaded and overwhelmed the French Army. Complete chaos followed. Everyone who could took to the roads and headed south to escape the invading army.


    It was a political and military disaster. It was a social upheaval. But it did not cause millions of civilian deaths. Because 70% of the French still lived on farms, they had a safety net that worked.


    There were no extensive government welfare programs. People were still used to looking out for themselves. They stocked wheat and potatoes. They knew how to grow a garden. And even if they lived in a city, they usually had close relatives on a farm not far away.


    For thousands of years, they had grown accustomed to protecting themselves from famine. Cows, sheep, horses -- all could be turned into dinner. In extremis, so could pets, rats and pigeons.


    The French still recalled the siege of Paris in 1870, when restaurants served up rat, cat and dog… as well as animals from the zoo. Cotelettes de chien aux pe pois (dog ribs with peas) was a favorite.


    70 Million Could Starve


    But today in France, as in the U.S., most people live in vast urbanized conglomerates. They have only a few days of food in stock. To get more, they depend on a sprawling, complex and delicate system of "just in time" shelf stocking.


    This depends on a number of things -- any one of which could render the entire system inoperable.


    First, there must be enough food produced to feed the world's population…


    There are seven billion people alive today -- twice as many as there were in 1940. And the world's output of food is just enough to feed them. In the simplest accounting, should food output decline by 10%, as many as 70 million people could starve.


    Nor is the food where people need it. It is not on small farms spread throughout the countryside. It is on large farms -- often a continent away from the people who will eat it.


    Fuel is vital. And as Gary North showed in the run up to the Y2K non-disaster, the transport system is regulated and controlled by computers, which are vulnerable to their own disasters.


    Experts say a large electromagnetic pulse could fry the switches, shutting down electricity and electronic communications for as long as six months.


    A Fragile System of Credit


    Fourteen years ago, North calculated that such a shutdown could leave millions dead.


    But this could be a much bigger disaster today. A breakdown in the Internet… or in the computer systems that operate ************ and ATMs… would leave 320 million unmedicated Americans wandering around in cold, dark malls… unable to communicate or do business with one another… with no way to get money or to spend it.


    Remember, our money system today is no longer based on either coins or paper money. It is a system of credit that depends on electronic transactions to keep track of who owes what to whom.


    If the electronic system goes down… so does the economy. Then our safety-net institutions will fail, too.


    In the U.S. today there are roughly 100 million people who depend on handouts from the government, including those on Social Security. Those handouts are delivered electronically. Many of these people typically have no savings, no supplies of food or medicine, no gardens, no fuel.


    In a matter of hours, they would be desperate.


    And of course, then there is the fiat money system. As we recently saw in Zimbabwe, when money loses its value the economy falls apart.


    Workers do not bus for nothing. Producers do not produce. Truckers do not truck. The shelves at Walmart, so recently groaning under the weight of products from all over the world, suddenly are stripped bare.


    That is when we'll be glad we have so many fat pets!


    - Bill Bonner

  2. #2
    mikefromsd
    mikefromsd's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 10-06-12
    Posts: 169
    Betpoints: 2257

    Way too long. Didn't read it. But I'm not afraid of whatever it is you're saying.

Top