Kinda silly argument^^... apples and oranges.
It's one thing running turbos for dailies... cuz no one wants to play 4-5 hours a day for 600pts tops.
The Final is clearly different for myriad reasons (5k prize, etc.) BUT, not the least of which is going from 30-40 players to a maxed out 100 players; flipping for stacks on the final table in the dailies vs. 9 other players is a tad bit different than flipping for stacks w/50 players left... dontcha think? Uh... yeah (flipping for stacks not necessarily required to make the FT of a daily, just 1 difference of a few).
Of course the same names appear @ top of leaderboard in dailies cuz there's strategy to turbos, too. But again, a 40 player max tourney is way different than a 100 max one (should be obvious) and to employ a structure where next to everyone is flipping for stacks @ 50 players left is really silly & dumb, IMO.
BTW, changing for a final event isn't a new concept in competition. Remember when the NFL changed the OT rules of the regular season for the playoffs/Super Bowl few years back? WHY?... cuz they deemed it different than the regular season... more important... so new rules needed to apply. Obviously not comparing SBR to NFL... I'm comparing the Big Picture concept/idea that Final competitions are more significant than regular/daily ones. Most grasp that concept, I think.