1. #36
    bobbywaves
    bobbywaves's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 05-06-08
    Posts: 13,278
    Betpoints: 960

    Quote Originally Posted by Robber View Post
    It's a fact that it used to pay 20 places
    Never denied 20 places were paid. Max entrants was 50, format wasn't designed to pay out 50%.

  2. #37
    Triple_D_Bet
    Triple_D_Bet's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 12-12-11
    Posts: 7,626
    Betpoints: 219

    Quote Originally Posted by bobbywaves View Post
    Acceptance is the first step to the long, long, loooooong road to wisdom.







    You're wrong on all counts. If I had taken the time to address them all, my post would be a page long.
    A+ for quoting people much smarter than you, D- for being wrong in your application of quoted wisdom.

    For the rest:

    Quote Originally Posted by Triple_D_Bet View Post
    We've been over this though; you're the only one who's not smart enough to figure it out.
    To someone incapable of understanding what makes a poker player good, I'm sure your brain isn't capable of recognizing the fact.

    How strange...being wrong has never stopped you from lengthy replies before; perhaps this time it's obvious even to you?

  3. #38
    Robber
    Robber's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 10-21-09
    Posts: 6,432
    Betpoints: 92737

    Quote Originally Posted by bobbywaves View Post
    Never denied 20 places were paid. Max entrants was 50, format wasn't designed to pay out 50%.

    Tournaments routinely did not fill, it does not matter what it was designed for, it only matters what happened

First 12
Top