link herbie?????
he killed who and did what?
 SBR Top-Rated Sportsbooks |
Best Sportsbooks List
|
|
| |||||
| #1 FanDuel | SBR rating 4.8/5 | Review | #6 BetRivers | SBR rating 4.1/5 | Review | #2 Caesars | SBR rating 4.7/5 | Review | #7 Fanatics | SBR rating 4.1/5 | Review |
| #3 DraftKings | SBR rating 4.7/5 | Review | #8 Betway | SBR rating 3.8/5 | Review | ||
| #4 BetMGM | SBR rating 4.6/5 | Review | #9 Borgata | SBR rating 3.5/5 | Review | ||
| #5 bet365 | SBR rating 4.6/5 | Review | #10 ClutchBet | SBR rating 2.9/5 | Review | ||
-
05-10-12 02:31 AM #71
-
05-10-12 02:34 AM #72
sounds like a lot of opinion to me.
no evidence or proof that he conspired or colluded with anyone.
-
05-10-12 02:39 AM #73
colluded is the wrong word,
Anyone with a brain knows what he did
This is equivalent to having 2 k in chips, betting 1600 chips, having 400 left, the other guy going all in and your folding your last 400 chips preflop
Just an example, so chill out.
We at the final table and people that can read know exactly what he did wrong.
On top of that he's done it before.
-
05-10-12 02:43 AM #74
Pos69 played his hand the way he did because he wanted tittywarrior to be the next person out of the tourney.
did it affect other players?yes
is it unethical ?yes
is it collusion? I don't think so
-
05-10-12 02:43 AM #75
I get where you're comin' from. I am just asking who should be deciding what is wrong.
It's either against a rule or it's not?
-
05-10-12 02:47 AM #76
On top of that, i wasn't guaranteed to go out the next hand, po69 called with crap and had to suck out just to win that one and said he would of done it even with 7 2 offsuit.
He kept the other guy in purposely. Doesn't matter if the other guy wasn't in on it. Ive posted this at 5 forums so far and if he even steps foot on there site or tourneys , he will be booted. I will see he does if he tries
-
05-10-12 02:48 AM #77
...
Originally Posted by ttwarrior1
[/b]well i do have one piece of advice that i have learned from this tradegy. First of all, we really didnt think that the storm was coming for us on thursday morning when we left for our little "vacation" as we thought that we were having. The storm was not supposed to do more than maybe 75 mile per hour winds. So we packed up alot of uninsured medical equipment and a few clothes and left in 4 cars. We luckily i did bring my sons playstation 2 and 20 games as well as maybe 15 dvd's of our 50 or so that we had. Then since my son would want to watch his own shows in the hotel, we packed a 20 inch tv and vcr in the car as well.
The playstation, tv and vcr idea has been great since i also packed a splitter and extra cables to split the hotel cable. First of all, it helped our sanity, then it at least kept $1000 worth of my electronics out of harms way. And we managed to bring 10 of our classic guitars with us since they would be stolen first.
But had we known that the storm would make a direct hit, then we would have brought 4 more cars with us packed with stuff. We left 2 cars at my house and 2 cars at another house. Well my mother in laws car is totally destroyed by the carport roof. She can buy her own new car for not wanting to drive out of town. But of course my other car has a tree on top of it.
We are not sure about our other house 10 minutes away at higher sea level, but hopefully it made it out ok.
The advice from me would be to pack your car to the absolute fullest and bring every car that you can full. We brought 4 cars, but we didnt even fill them up.
Now i have to buy all new clothes etc. I even left our pets at the house, but not too worried about that, or at least until my son asks about them in a few weeks!
Well of course i dont have a personal computer now. I will buy one later this month hopefully, but it may take 6 months to get any insurance money and not everything was insured of course.
Well, at least we are alive.
By the way, geraldo rivera doesnt know shit about what he is talking about on fox tonight. He has made many mistakes and many,many more people stayed behind in the city than he thinks. I would estimate that at least 2,000 people stayed and they are probably looting the hell out of the city right now.
Well the worst thing is that our practice will be virtually shut down for along time as well. So no house and no money coming in for a while.
Then to just kick me in the ass, my local poker room is under water with possibly no chance for repair!
no clue what anyone is talking about with the editing of the thread, but i can tell you this....when i met po69 at the bash, i can say that i have never met a creepier person in my life. to top it all off, he claims to have killed a few people in mexico while being a doctor. The worst part about that is that he said something along the lines of, "who cares, it was an accident." not sure if he is lying about that or not, but imo this guy just wreaked of being a scumbag. Have no idea about his prior history here, but this guy is no good. Shady as they come.i didnt kill anyone. 2 patients may have died under my care from post surgical complications. Killed and died are two totally different things!! I wasnt the only doctor who was there and in mexico the surgical areas are not as sterile as they are here in the us. Even here in the us, patients die from nosocomial infections. It can happen and it did.
in one case, 2 sponges were left inside a patient. We are supposed to count those as physicians, but we always take them out and announce the count to a presiding nurse who is responsible for the final count. Well, not sure what happened, but the nurse gave us the correct count, but it was obviously incorrect. Of course i wouldnt expect 99% of the posters to understand such things in depth, so that is all that i will say on the matter.
-
05-10-12 02:54 AM #78
I'm not sure whats more irritating, TTWarrior starting this thread and whining about PO69 and then saying it has nothing to do with him or Hawley acting like he's trying to solve some sort of serial killing spree.
What if all the chip counts were the same and this was a big money tourney and replace TTWarrior with someone like Phil Ivey? Would there be anything wrong with what PO69 did?
PlayersOnly can do whatever the hell he wants with his chips as long as he is not colluding with another player at the table and he clearly wasn't.Nomination(s):This post was nominated 3 times . To view the nominated thread please click here. People who nominated: milwaukee mike, shari91, and yisman
-
05-10-12 02:55 AM #79
sick, sick, we shouldn't want a person like this on sbr
Doesn't surprise me a bit though. Dumb as well, i live in ky and knew that storm was bad.
-
05-10-12 03:08 AM #80
Then you should petition to have him banned based on the other stuff you don't like about him.
You shouldnt be using a poker move as your platform to ban him.
-
05-10-12 03:12 AM #81I'd never gamble again for Taylor Swift
Become A Pro!
Join Date: 08-31-11Posts: 12,722Betpoints: 14
I think SBR would have banned this guy a long time ago if they thought he was emotionally stable.
-
05-10-12 03:15 AM #82
You mean unstable.
-
05-10-12 03:16 AM #83I'd never gamble again for Taylor Swift
Join Date: 08-31-11Posts: 12,722Betpoints: 14
uhh... no.. learn how to read. Originally Posted by Jayvegas420
-
05-10-12 03:17 AM #84
So, they ban the stable posters & allow the unstable ones to continue to post?
-
05-10-12 03:20 AM #85I'd never gamble again for Taylor Swift
Join Date: 08-31-11Posts: 12,722Betpoints: 14
No, I think SBR worries titties would kill himself without being able to post here and don't want his blood on their hands, einstein. Originally Posted by Jayvegas420
-
05-10-12 03:25 AM #86
-
05-10-12 03:32 AM #87
I'm sorry I didn't put all this together.
I'm a little slow.
-
05-10-12 03:55 AM #88
Hey back off pal. Originally Posted by andywend
A complaint was laid and I will be carrying out an official investigation with due diligence
Far too soon to be drawing conclusions. Leave this to the the SBR Fraud detection squad. We were assembled for disputes like this.
-
05-10-12 04:02 AM #89
Dick move, no place for that in poker.
-
05-10-12 04:03 AM #90
Hawley I am pumped as this is my first case on the Fraud Detection Squad. So far we have hit PO69 with a code 4 infraction and it could be worse based on his cooperation or lack thereof with authorities. I vow to not let the team down. Originally Posted by hawley
Baruch Hashit.
-
05-10-12 04:07 AM #91
What in fuks name are you two bozos talking about?
-
05-10-12 04:07 AM #92
Originally Posted by ZetaPsi808
god bless you pal.
Zeta it is an absolute honor to have you on board with this investigation.
John handed us full power to investigate the event and administer penalties as we see fit.
I am data mining the full tournament hand history for unusual behavior searching for collusion. We are nothing if not comprehensive.
-
05-10-12 04:09 AM #93
Gee an official complaint was laid regarding some unusual behavior. Originally Posted by Gee
John placed the fraud detection squad in charge of investigating. We are still in the preliminary stages here.
-
05-10-12 06:07 AM #94
hawley,
Do you sleep?
just curious
-
05-10-12 06:25 AM #95
Funny stuff.We are still in the preliminary stages here.
-
05-10-12 07:02 AM #96
Still not entirely sure what you are on about pal, but good luck with the invetigation. Originally Posted by hawley
-
05-10-12 07:19 AM #97
U sir are a sniper . Thank you. I hope you used an elephant gun Originally Posted by ngates815
-
05-10-12 08:01 AM #98
-
05-10-12 08:49 AM #99
We don't want you on SBR but we don't get our way either. Shut up Originally Posted by ttwarrior1
-
05-10-12 09:21 AM #100
No he's not aware of much Originally Posted by hawley
-
05-10-12 09:39 AM #101
the fact the moron blatantly said he was doing it to **** ttwarrior over makes it collusion, otherwise i dont mind players who are dumb enough to fold getting roughly 6 to 1 on a call closing the action.
-
05-10-12 09:42 AM #102
um no that still doesn't make it collusion, i agree it was pretty dumb to say that but he wanted to piss off tt, and it worked. Originally Posted by thetrinity
col·lu·sion(k
-l
zhn)n.A secret agreement between two or more parties for a fraudulent, illegal, or deceitful purpose.
-
05-10-12 09:46 AM #103
try this at a casino then and see what happens to you if you think its legit. Originally Posted by milwaukee mike
um no that still doesn't make it collusion, i agree it was pretty dumb to say that but he wanted to piss off tt, and it worked.
col·lu·sion(k-lzhn)n.A secret agreement between two or more parties for a fraudulent, illegal, or deceitful purpose.
if he didnt open his mouth he could have plead ignorance at least.
-
05-10-12 09:51 AM #104
Gentlemen.......slow down. ttwarrior1 is a paid poster and this incident was scripted from the beginning for traffic purposes.
Nice work Tubs.
-
05-10-12 09:57 AM #105
if that is true Originally Posted by William Walters
good for him
he deserves it
Reply With Quote
