[Mr KLC]

I'm sorry I'm making so many threads today. Normally there isn't this much collusion put up on Twitter to entice you to bet a certain way. Anyway, here's how they are trying to get you to bet on this game.

Saints road dogs in KC, over 60% of money on Chiefs to cover.



This time they want you to bet against the money by laying that meaningless history stat on the Saints. It doesn't even tell you if that stat is team history, or at least what year it begins. If the money is going to the Chiefs, I'll take the -6.5 here.

[DOM_Toretto]

Who is "they"? "They" want you to bet a certain way? Is this a sportsbook tweeting or posting this?

There's not much to your fading "formula" is there?

Pretty dumb.

[Mr KLC]

I went with these stats beforehand and went 1-6. Now I'm going against them and am 3-1 so far. If I faded everything I posted from these Twitter stats I found, I'd be 9-2 right now.

[DOM_Toretto]

Huge sample size

[Mr KLC]

There are groups and posters in Twitterland that randomly post these meaningless history stats to entice you to go that route, and lose. If they want to do all this work to sucker me into a bad play, then I'll just take the opposite of what they are alluring me with. It's a damn conspiracy to keep the gambler down.