Secret Service Agents Claim Clinton Marriage ‘Total Fake’
(CBS News) – Author Ronald Kessler defends secret service agents and makes some sensational claims about former Presidents in his new book, The First Family Detail: Secret Service Agents Reveal the Hidden Lives of the Presidents.
Kessler told Chris Stigall on Talk Radio 1210 WPHT that the recent struggles of the agency detailed in the media is more the fault of management culture than individual agents.
“The culture that has led to this corner-cutting, it’s a culture within the management, not among the agents. Agents…are patriots. They sign up to take a bullet for the President. The management has the attitude of covering up, dismissing problems, retaliating against agents that do reports problems. Unfortunately, President Obama’s decision to appoint Joseph Clancy, a veteran agent, to continue as Director, has just continued the same culture, because he really represents that culture.”
He reports some very scandalous stories in the book, including allegations of former President Clinton carrying out liaisons with another women when his wife, former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, is not around.
“He has a blonde, busty mistress, and she’s been code named Energizer by agents. This is unofficially, but that is what they call her…She comes in to the Chappaqua [NY] home whenever Hillary leaves. The details coordinate to make sure they don’t cross paths. She, unlike Hillary, is very nice to the agents. She’ll bring cookies.”
Kessler also contends the Clinton’s relationship is only based on their desire to return to the White House in 2016.
“Agents say that it’s a business relationship. It’s not a marriage at all. It’s a total fake, like everything else about Hillary. It’s just a big show and a scam.”
Clinton campaign complains of 'egregious' New York Times reporting errors
The Hillary Clinton campaign sent a nearly 2,000-word letter to the executive editor of The New York Times this week expressing "grave concern" with a recent and controversial report relating to the former Secretary of State's private email account.
"We remain perplexed by the Times’ slowness to acknowledge its errors after the fact, and some of the shaky justifications that Times’ editors have made," Clinton communications director Jennifer Palmieri wrote in the letter to Dean Baquet, which the campaign forwarded to the On Media blog late Thursday night.
<figure class="art" style="box-sizing: border-box; margin: 0px;">
</figure><header style="box-sizing: border-box;">Clinton campaign complains of 'egregious' New York Times reporting errors
</header><footer class="meta" style="box-sizing: border-box; margin-top: 0.5em;">By DYLAN BYERS
7/30/15 9:58 PM EDT </footer>
The Hillary Clinton campaign sent a nearly 2,000-word letter to the executive editor of The New York Times this week expressing "grave concern" with a recent and controversial report relating to the former Secretary of State's private email account.
"We remain perplexed by the Times’ slowness to acknowledge its errors after the fact, and some of the shaky justifications that Times’ editors have made," Clinton communications director Jennifer Palmieri wrote in the letter to Dean Baquet, which the campaign forwarded to the On Media blog late Thursday night.
Purely from a political campaign perspective - what would be her upside to making noise right now?
#1 - she's got that whole email scandal that her campaign "hopes" people will tire of in a few months.
#2 - she knows she has a lot of negatives against her, so no use having a "trump" moment right now and giving the Fox-News/Redstate echo chamber a rallying point.
#3 - the GOP is in full panic mode over Trump. The republican party is fracturing before our very eyes. Wasn't it Napoleon who is attributed to the "never interrupt your enemy when he is making a mistake"?
she had her one shot in 2008. Just as Christie did in 2012.
Hillary is toast. She has no ideas. Can't run on the policies of the last 8-years and can't blame the guy for the last 8 years either. Lose lose situation. No democrat has a chance next year.
Last edited by DwightShrute; 08-02-15 at 04:22 PM.
she had her one shot in 2008. Just as Christie did in 2012.
Hillary is toast. She has no ideas. Can't run on the policies of the last 8-years and can't blame the guy for the last 8 years either. Lose lose situation. No democrat has a chance next year.
I will agree with Dwight on this one. This evil bitch has played I am the hurt female and I have stood by my evil fukked up man all through everything and now she thinks the demonazicommiefukkupcrappy part owes her since ofukkup won the last two. This is the last thing that we need is for this evil bitch to get elected.
I want to see the lies coming out of her mouth in October when she testifies on Benghazi!! I can't wait!
I don't know what Hillary's strategy should be moving forward because I think she's lost some ground and I'm getting worried the more she talks the more she gets in trouble
I don't know what Hillary's strategy should be moving forward because I think she's lost some ground and I'm getting worried the more she talks the more she gets in trouble
That penetrating lesbo is done. They got her server and already found top secret files on there after she repeatable said there was no classified documents on her server. Put that dike in jail.
Purely from a political campaign perspective - what would be her upside to making noise right now?
#1 - she's got that whole email scandal that her campaign "hopes" people will tire of in a few months.
#2 - she knows she has a lot of negatives against her, so no use having a "trump" moment right now and giving the Fox-News/Redstate echo chamber a rallying point.
#3 - the GOP is in full panic mode over Trump. The republican party is fracturing before our very eyes. Wasn't it Napoleon who is attributed to the "never interrupt your enemy when he is making a mistake"?
#4 - she can just act like she's already won the thing, just like in 2008.
#5 - she can claim she's under investigation by the FBI and that any talking on the campaign trail can and will be used against her in the court of law.
yea Mo lets just flood the country with 3rd worlders and give everybody free shit, all the while vilifying and destroying any productive, self sufficient people. That's the democratic message
yea Mo lets just flood the country with 3rd worlders and give everybody free shit, all the while vilifying and destroying any productive, self sufficient people. That's the democratic message
Not saying the democratic party is any better.
Both Parties in the US suck. This is why I would never live there unless I was given an incredible opportunity.
This is just a small clip of the whole thing, only three examples.
There are plenty of uninformed voters on all political affiliations.
The problem is not with either side but that there are tons of a poorly educated and poorly informed voters in the United States.
Politics plays into this and often the candidate who can appeal to the lowest common denominator (Trump this year) is successful because he provides a platform that does not require education, interest, attention or knowledge to understand and rather amounts to simple talking points that Joe 12 pack, whose piece of the pie is getting steadily smaller, can understand and get behind.
Last edited by MoMoneyMoVaughn; 08-12-15 at 04:28 PM.
SBR Top-Rated Sportsbooks
Originally Posted by KingJD31
Reply With Quote
brooks85 gave spro23 10 Betpoint(s) for this post.
