[Russian Rocket]

Azarenka -2 games at -105

gl!

[Ted Sheckler]

Took the -125 ML
I'm hoping she takes it in straights, but scared Makarova comes out with a 6-2 or 6-0 in the 1st, then azarenka gets her shit together and doesn't cover the -2.

Good luck though.

[Russian Rocket]

Took the -125 ML
I'm hoping she takes it in straights, but scared Makarova comes out with a 6-2 or 6-0 in the 1st, then azarenka gets her shit together and doesn't cover the -2.

Good luck though.

yeah I was thinking about putting a little on straight sets for Aza, but Makarova has been playing well lately and Victoria is still a bit rusty

gl!

[jjgold]

I think was Waz is the winner of the tourney

Azzy playing well put in for a tough one today

[Ted Sheckler]

Match changer right there. Start celebrating now Rocket.

[Russian Rocket]

Match changer right there. Start celebrating now Rocket.

working here...what happened, pal?

[Ted Sheckler]

set 2 game 1 makarova wins to love
game 2 azarenka serving down 0-40 fights back to save the game.


Game over.

[Russian Rocket]

set 2 game 1 makarova wins to love
game 2 azarenka serving down 0-40 fights back to save the game.


Game over.

Aza is in serious trouble here...we need this serve and a break badly right now

[jjgold]

This girl a little better player

She could clip Serena next round

[Russian Rocket]

well...so much for this bet ...looks like a straight set win for Makarova...who would've of thought

[Ted Sheckler]

I think there is going to be a timeout to reinforce the steel on the chair umps stand. Legs on the stand are starting to flex outwards, should give azarenka enough time to get her shit together.

[pattymayo]

well...so much for this bet ...looks like a straight set win for Makarova...who would've of thought

She closed around +110 , this isn't a shocking result really

[t-wizzle]

Great call.

As square as square gets.

[Ted Sheckler]

Great call rocket, as square as it gets...Rocket didn't you know Makarova closed at +110, so her winning in straights was about a 90% sure thing.
Get a clue rocket!

[Russian Rocket]

Great call.

As square as square gets.

says who...the dumbfukk who picks one winner out of 100?
get lost before you get hurt little girly man

[jjgold]

All you guys do is bash but have no balls posting pics

Everyone here has the wintner when the match is over

[Russian Rocket]

Great call rocket, as square as it gets...Rocket didn't you know Makarova closed at +110, so her winning in straights was about a 90% sure thing.
Get a clue rocket!

there is no such a thing a sure thing in gambling Teddy

get a fkin clue please

[jjgold]

Rocket probably hits 70% here when he makes a play on any sport

[Russian Rocket]

All you guys do is bash but have no balls posting pics

Everyone here has the wintner when the match is over

I'm not even sure what else we need to discuss here? The picks are posted to get a the conversation going - nothing more than that really.
I'm pretty sure that all of us here can't be on the same side of the bet all the time.

[Russian Rocket]

Rocket probably hits 70% here when he makes a play on any sport

[t-wizzle]

This guy is such a loser.

[Russian Rocket]

She closed around +110 , this isn't a shocking result really

yo Mayo...if this isn't such a shocking result, where were you before the game with Makarova pick? Why didn't you share a bit of your wisdom with all of us?

[t-wizzle]

yo Mayo...if this isn't such a shocking result, where were you before the game with Makarova pick? Why didn't you share a bit of your wisdom with all of us?

Because he probably didn't think it was something that needed to be spelled out but apparently it did for you.

[Vegas39]

rocket be trolled by the air betting fraud named t-wizz

[Russian Rocket]

This guy is such a loser.

Not everyone can be a winner like you

wait what is this? ohh that's right....it's your fukking record cuntface




http://www.sportsbookreview.com/foru...l#post21756119
total = 63x loser


Clippers -5 -109 (4x) loser
Clippers 1H -3 -105 (2x) loser
Trail Blazers ML +102 (5x) loser
Adding Blazers -1 +100 (2x) loser
Blazers Live +6 -110 (3x) loser;
ML +240 (1x) loser
Clippers -4.5 -105 (4x) loser
Nets +8 -105 (4x) loser;
ML +315 (.5x) loser
Nets 1H +4.5 -105 (2x) loser;
ML +225 (.5x) loser
Trail Blazers +7 -117 (3x) loser;
ML +255 (.5x) loser
Trail Blazers 1H +4 -110 (4x) loser
Trail Blazers +7 -107 (4x) loser;
ML +275 (.5x) loser
Trail Blazers 1H +4 -110 (2x) loser;
ML +185 (.5x) loser
Trail Blazers Series Price +350 (2x) loser
Blazers +6.5 -105 (4x) loser
ML +260 (1x) loser
Also adding 2x to Blazers 1H +4 -110 loser
.5x to Blazers 1H ML +185 loser
Blazers 2H -3.5 -109 (4x) loser
Clippers +5.5 -108 (12x); loser
ML +205 (2x) loser
Pacers -4 -107 (3x) loser
Thunder -5.5 -103 (4x) loser
Bradley Beal Under 17.5 pts -130 (.5x) loser
Thunder 1H +3 -105 (2.5x) loser
ML +160 (.5x) loserPacers +2.5 -105 (3x) loser
Pacers Live +2.5 +100 (1x) loser
Spurs +2.5 -107 (8x) loser
ML +125 (3x) loser
Spurs to win Series 4-0 +900 (.5x) loser
Pacers +6 -103 (4x) loser
ML +245 (1x) loser
Spurs ML +135 (4x) - Took this yesterday loser
Spurs ML +130 (14x) - Added today loser
Spurs 1H ML +125 (2x) loser
Spurs to win Series 4-1 +385 (1x) loser
Pacers +8.5 -108 (2.5x) loser
Pacers 1H +4.5 +100 (1.5x) loser
Thunder -3.5 -105 (5x) loser
Thunder -8.5 +207 (.75x) loser
Thunder 2H ML +120 (1x) loser
Spurs -4 -106 (6x) loser
Spurs 2H -3 -102 (2x) loser
Heat -5 -108 (6x) loser



0-53 -222.34 psi

Diamondbacks ML -111 (2x) loser
Diamondbacks RL +190 (.5x) loser
Brewers TT Under 3.5 +110 (1x) loser
Phillies ML +139 (1x) loser
Red Sox ML +134 (1.5x) loser
Red Sox RRL +205 (.5x) loser
Red Sox TT Over 3.5 +100 (1x) loser
Pirates ML -120 (1x) loser
Pirates RL +135 (.5x) loser
Pirates TT Over 4.5 +100 (.5x) loser
Indians ML -104 (2x) loser
Indians RL +190 (.5x) loser
Padres ML -106 (1.5x) loser
Padres RRL +170 (.5x) loser
Mets ML +100 (1x) loser
A's TT Under 4 -120 (.5x)loser
Mets ML +100 (1x) loser
A's TT Under 4 -120 (.5x) loser
Royals ML -141 (1x) loser
Royals RL +155 (.5x) loser
White Sox ML +136 (.4x) loser
Mariners ML -137 (1x) loser
Red Sox TT Under 3 +100 (1x) loser
Orioles ML -148 (3x) loser
Orioles RL +140 (1x) loser
Rays TT Under 4 -115 (1x) loser
Rays/Orioles Under 8.5 +110 (.5x) loser

http://www.sportsbookreview.com/forum/baseball-betting/2848598-2014-diamond-plays-p5.html#post22146535


Hundo on the RL +145 and a few more bucks on the -2.5 +235 loser

http://www.sportsbookreview.com/forum/players-talk/2916441-gotta-roll-vanimal-pirates-tonight.html

0-29 -31 psi


lol

[jjgold]

Wizzle that's a lot to red on your handicapping sheet

Russianrocket you should see youmadbro he wins $5000 a week and never post a pic

[t-wizzle]

Yep. 0-82.


The best part is the Russian is clearly flustered right now and we all see it.

[Russian Rocket]

rocket be trolled by the air betting fraud named t-wizz

I'm pretty sure I can bury that fukking dumbass in a baskeball betting contest without ever placing a basketball bet in my entire life

[pattymayo]

yo Mayo...if this isn't such a shocking result, where were you before the game with Makarova pick? Why didn't you share a bit of your wisdom with all of us?

Geez why so defensive? I didn't even bet the match, but you sound like a moron saying "who would've thought makarova would win in straights"

It's not a shocking result at all, again she was only +110 and if you follow tennis at all you would know how will she's been playing and how inconsistent Vika has been

I get you don't follow much tennis and just bet the popular names you know, but do your homework first pal

[Russian Rocket]

Yep. 0-82.


The best part is the Russian is clearly flustered right now and we all see it.

Why would I be frustrated about losing a single bet?

please tell us more

Hey clown let me know when wanna do a 50-100 game capping contest against me with loser living this site for good.

I'll fukkin bury you so bad, you'll be begging mods to ban your sorry ass before the contest is over

[jjgold]

Vika has been playing well this tournament

This chick played perfect

[STAY STRONG]

​fight.

[Russian Rocket]

Geez why so defensive? I didn't even bet the match, but you sound like a moron saying "who would've thought makarova would win in straights"

It's not a shocking result at all, again she was only +110 and if you follow tennis at all you would know how will she's been playing and how inconsistent Vika has been

I get you don't follow much tennis and just bet the popular names you know, but do your homework first pal

why am I being a moron for sayin who would've thought? I did my homework and I came up with Azarenka pick
like I said earlier, if you wanna throw big words like this is a square bet...shut your fukking pie hole and post up a play before the game

you said that predicting a winner in this matchup was easy- why didn't you share this with everyone dummy? Did you forget to wear your fukking ball sack today, was that the real reason?

[Russian Rocket]

Vika has been playing well this tournament

This chick played perfect

coach it's impossible to start a fukkin thread with a pick here nowadays
these mofos are sitting on the sidelines and just waiting for you to lose
you never see them comment or say anything when you win

fukking kindergarten nonsense

[Bumdeal]

I bet Vika and lost as well because I am an idiot.

The young kid almost beat her, she has looked better than she has recently but still not great. I should have known Makarova was going to push her shit in, I was just hopeful because I picked her to go deep in the stupid tennis sub forum contest.