Is there an important distinction?
 SBR Top-Rated Sportsbooks |
Best Sportsbooks List
|
|
| |||||
| #1 FanDuel | SBR rating 4.8/5 | Review | #6 BetRivers | SBR rating 4.1/5 | Review | #2 Caesars | SBR rating 4.7/5 | Review | #7 Fanatics | SBR rating 4.1/5 | Review |
| #3 DraftKings | SBR rating 4.7/5 | Review | #8 Betway | SBR rating 3.8/5 | Review | ||
| #4 BetMGM | SBR rating 4.6/5 | Review | #9 Borgata | SBR rating 3.5/5 | Review | ||
| #5 bet365 | SBR rating 4.6/5 | Review | #10 ClutchBet | SBR rating 2.9/5 | Review | ||
-
12-09-13 05:33 PM #1
Oddsmakers v. Bookmakers
-
12-09-13 05:38 PM #2
In generic terms... Most, large % , of BM are NOT OM
-
12-09-13 06:30 PM #3
That seems right.
Originally Posted by Sam Odom
I am thinking in the context of line watching.
Oddsmakers set lines, bookmakers adjust lines to even money - in very simplistic terms.
Inside that context, I was wondering if there was an important distinction between the two insofar as finding percieved value in a bet.
-
12-09-13 06:38 PM #4
Just for the sake of chitchatting...
If the OMs own the Opening lines and BMs own the closers then the BMs have the sharpest lines
Knowing the closers ahead of time would be worth a great deal of $$$Nomination(s):This post was nominated 1 time . To view the nominated thread please click here. People who nominated: ksnooksk
-
12-09-13 06:40 PM #5
Solid post, sammy. Originally Posted by Sam Odom
Reply With Quote