Originally Posted by
Seto
I did indeed read wrong, so maybe more like -2500 than -1000 to -1500 which is worse. But still not nearly in the "worst beat I've ever seen" type, despite the psychology of it. I do understand where you're coming from though, but still, this is not nearly what it's made to look like.
You want to hear a bad beat story? I had Nadal-5.5 over Tsonga this year at Monte Carlo, on clay where Nadal destroys everyone. He won the first set 6-3 and led 5-1 in the 2nd and was serving for the match. Tsonga was +900 to break that game. He breaks. ok, no biggie, still 2 chances to close it out, one of them on serve. Nadal races ahead 0-40 on Tsonga's serve and has 3 match points. Blows all 3 and Tsonga eventually holds. Still, Tsonga to break was +900 in that last game again so I was still a heavy, heavy favorite to win my bet. And yet Nadal gets broken again.
Essentially, Tsonga to win those 3 straight games was like parlaying +900, -200 and +900, and that doesn't even take into account that he was 0-40 down on serve in one of those games. Those 3 odds added come to +15000 live for me to lose my bet.
Now THAT qualifies for a worst beat of all time type bet.
Oh, and I also had the Grizzlies over the Clippers in that game where they blew a 24 point lead with 7'55 left to go in the 4th.