[Vitothecapper]

Bronco's will open up 27.5 point fav's over the Jaguars on 10-13-2013

[LT Profits]

it is down to -25 now.

[innovation]

buccs were +27 back in 1976

[slacker00]

Once it gets that high, there are so many ways it can backdoor cover. Take the points.

[frostno98]

Vegas is fully aware that joe public will use the Patriot past year spread as a reason to take the Jags, they're going for dogs bettors here. The Broncos will win 49-13.

[InTheDrink]

Once it gets that high, there are so many ways it can backdoor cover. Take the points.

kill yourself if your willing to lay $ on the jags

[innovation]

Once it gets that high, there are so many ways it can backdoor cover. Take the points.

like the batman movie where the football field caves in

[53 defense]

heard John Madden on xm radio today. his take on the game was that even if the broncos ONLY SCORED 4 TDS that the Jags would be hard pressed to score at all ( especially with Gabbert). With that, there will be those who say way too many points to lay right???????? wrong !!!!!! Denver is running with such flow that Id be surprised if they dont score at least 40 this week. No, I dont think the Jags will rush the ball 50 times and keep the ball for 30 minutes, which is the only shot they have to keep it under the number. Payton gets his 4 td passes, they rush for 1, defense gets 1 and throw in a field goal or two. Cant over think this one. I can they see them winning 1 maybe 2 games this year but the Jags are an awful team, and will quit early and often in 2013. and thats that!

[broadway6]

Jags may beat the rams on Sunday.

[Rich Boy]

Broncos might not play 100%, might take it easy, its human nature

[pinnacle420]

wow what a wild line... 23-24 yes..... but 27.5

[Vinnie Paz]

I might take first half spread instead. Although i like taking denver at home for the full game spread because teams tend to wear down in the alt. Who knows right now, maybe even denver TT would be better.

Man Jags just lost at home by 30+ and only scored a fg vsIndy.Now on the road vs Denver? Oh my

[sweethook]

they will lay down . just a soft win

[slacker00]

kill yourself if your willing to lay $ on the jags

I'm taking them @STL this week! Watch and learn.

[pavyracer]

They can open as +35 vs Broncos and still not cover.

[ksnooksk]

It will take one of three possible things to take them @ Denver....

1) Inside info
2) Balls of steel
3) Stupidity

[Big Bear]

you know Lakerboy is going to make a thread for Jaguars ML

[easyliving]

Denver might win by 50 here

[ksnooksk]

35-3 still covers.

[easyliving]

preseason line at Cantor was -14 how much have our perceptions changed in 4 weeks of football

[Sarunas]

you know Lakerboy is going to make a thread for Jaguars ML

lakerboy make expert thinks on big dog!




here he make scream: "GET BACK ON HELICOPTAR! JAGS MAKE WIN! SPREAD IS FOR THE BUTTER!"

[LionsFTW]

The problem is the Broncos are too good. Most likely, the Broncos will score on 7 out of their first 9 drives and Jags will have 2 scores on their first 9. The score will likely be 45-6 or 45-10 in the late 3rd or early fourth. Jags will keep playing their starters and Broncos pull everyone (they did against the Eagles) and just run the ball. Jags will score another TD vs the Broncos 2nd/3rd string making it 45-13 or 45-17. Now your bet becomes can the Bronco's backups hold or score more than the Jags starters?

This is almost exactly how the Hawks v Jags game played out, but Tavaris Jackson and Rob Turbin are far more polished then Brock Osweiler and Monte Ball.

If the spread does come out at 27+, Jags are the play.

[skeletonboy]

Jacksonville has a very decent shot at 0-16 for the season. Denver will score 40 against Jax even if manning plays one half.

[frostno98]

The problem is the Broncos are too good. Most likely, the Broncos will score on 7 out of their first 9 drives and Jags will have 2 scores on their first 9. The score will likely be 45-6 or 45-10 in the late 3rd or early fourth. Jags will keep playing their starters and Broncos pull everyone (they did against the Eagles) and just run the ball. Jags will score another TD vs the Broncos 2nd/3rd string making it 45-13 or 45-17. Now your bet becomes can the Bronco's backups hold or score more than the Jags starters?

This is almost exactly how the Hawks v Jags game played out, but Tavaris Jackson and Rob Turbin are far more polished then Brock Osweiler and Monte Ball.

If the spread does come out at 27+, Jags are the play.

Your betting assuming that the Jags will backdoor cover and the Broncos defense is just going to let them score, unlikely. The Broncos defense will continue to play hard and work on shutting teams out after what happened in Baltimore last year.

[GunShard]

I can't bet against Peyton Manning.

But if you had to bet, add the Jaguars in a 10 point teaser to +37.5 spread.

[Mocknroll]

The problem is the Broncos are too good. Most likely, the Broncos will score on 7 out of their first 9 drives and Jags will have 2 scores on their first 9. The score will likely be 45-6 or 45-10 in the late 3rd or early fourth. Jags will keep playing their starters and Broncos pull everyone (they did against the Eagles) and just run the ball. Jags will score another TD vs the Broncos 2nd/3rd string making it 45-13 or 45-17. Now your bet becomes can the Bronco's backups hold or score more than the Jags starters?

This is almost exactly how the Hawks v Jags game played out, but Tavaris Jackson and Rob Turbin are far more polished then Brock Osweiler and Monte Ball.

If the spread does come out at 27+, Jags are the play.

Based on your own research the play is Broncos 1H not Jags and the points.

[slacker00]

I can't bet against Peyton Manning.

But if you had to bet, add the Jaguars in a 10 point teaser to +37.5 spread.

You better make it a 13 point teaser. That 38-40 point range is too valuable to pass up. *sarcasm*

[Sarunas]

55-10?

[NavsPicks]

13 pt teaser on Denver + over.. How does that lose?

[Sarunas]

have knowledges jaguars make appear?

maybes appear but not make appear!

[blankoblanco]

I can't bet against Peyton Manning.

But if you had to bet, add the Jaguars in a 10 point teaser to +37.5 spread.

I think teasing is bad in general but Jags have to be one of the worst teams all-time to tease, they're capable of losing by 40 to anyone with an offense

[bringyourDgame]

I can't bet against Peyton Manning.

But if you had to bet, add the Jaguars in a 10 point teaser to +37.5 spread.

I'd rather tease the other way, Broncos -17.5. Maybe Manning wants to set a record that day... and even if he doesnt feel like it, Broncos still win by at least 18

[pavyracer]

I think teasing is bad in general but Jags have to be one of the worst teams all-time to tease, they're capable of losing by 40 to anyone with an offense

Teasing a -27.5 line either way is meaningless. You lose so much value.

[LionsFTW]

Based on your own research the play is Broncos 1H not Jags and the points.

Absolutely. Its the same reason you always bet Oregon 1H

[LionsFTW]

Your betting assuming that the Jags will backdoor cover and the Broncos defense is just going to let them score, unlikely. The Broncos defense will continue to play hard and work on shutting teams out after what happened in Baltimore last year.

Their defense is already thin, especially at LB and DB. You're not leaving these guys in to possibly get hurt up 30 in the fourth. Jags were about to score on the 5th best defense in total yards' backups, what makes me believe they can't against the 14th best?