[konck]

Last week the top 2 fades won I wrote them up
This week the top 2 fades are

T Bay 1200 pks vs Oak 600pks
Money wagered
TBay 200k vs Oak 25k
Bets over 1k 4-1 in favor of TBay
MY top Pk this week is OAKLAND I love this game

Bears 1900 pks vs Tenn 1000pks
Bears 119k over 83k
Not so happy about this game but Ill take TENN and hope I get a good home dog effort

Ill have to look at the game monday night but it pts to the public liking the dog killer
if that holds up and the money keeps coming in on them Ill bet the lowly STAINS at home

[SBR_John]

Nice work.

[cyberbabble]

I'm watching these numbers too. It will be interesting to see how things work out. The Tampa-Oakland money is so out of balance that it is hard for me to believe it is accurate.

Minnesota - Seattle is one to watch.

Smallest amount of money of all the games -> no public interest. Only bettors are sharps(?) and a few die hard fans. Big bets and money % are on Seattle.

[konck]

I'm watching these numbers too. It will be interesting to see how things work out. The Tampa-Oakland money is so out of balance that it is hard for me to believe it is accurate.

Minnesota - Seattle is one to watch.

Smallest amount of money of all the games -> no public interest. Only bettors are sharps(?) and a few die hard fans. Big bets and money % are on Seattle.

Last week was great for me the public accoording to the new consensus lost. So far today not so good
Tenn is crushed an has no shot. Im gonna hammer Oakland

[dodger33]

Is it down for you as well right now?

[Rod_M]

Is it down for you as well right now?

Up and running here:

http://www.sportsbookreview.com/betting-odds/consensus/

What kind of problem are you having?

[dodger33]

Thanks for the quick response Rod. That and regular sbrodds.com are just timing out on the connections for me. Both on my laptop and iphone.

[Rod_M]

That's strange, are both of them on the same wireless connection maybe? I just tried on my mobile using a US VPN and it loaded just fine, could you try restarting your modem/router? Also if you can try using your mobile data connection, if you are on wifi that is.

[konck]

What a great tool this is hope the NBA gets up and running soon

[SBR_John]

What a great tool this is hope the NBA gets up and running soon

I mentioned that NBA is going to take a little longer due to the nature of it being basically an everyday sport. In about a week I should have a firm estimate on when NBA will be ready.

[spankie]

Considering we have no idea where these numbers come from this data is useless.

What's the source?

[SBR_John]

Considering we have no idea where these numbers come from this data is useless.

What's the source?

We are using data from offshore books who have a diverse player base, a solid rating and only deal a single line. That's all we can disclose.

[spankie]

We are using data from offshore books who have a diverse player base, a solid rating and only deal a single line. That's all we can disclose.

When will the sources be revealed?

[McBa1n]

sheesh, the public, according to the numbers, is killing it today vs last week.
You know it's a bad week for the books when even the 'pay touts', according to the consensus site, are killing it. Shocking, really - touts had a huge week so far in picks.

Tough luck on your fades, Konck. Brutal week to fade the public.


Also very interesting the % of action on Dallas tonight.
Be cool to see ML coin on the games - that'd be badass.

[GUMMO77]

Fades didn't work out this week, but the +$1000 bets sure did.

Amazing results (this week) for whatever team the majority of the +$1000 betters played.

[SBR_John]

When will the sources be revealed?

As soon as we can convince them that this data will have no negative consequences, on the contrary it will be a positive marketing tool. And of course that we can compile it accurately and market it appropriately.

[McBa1n]

As soon as we can convince them that this data will have no negative consequences, on the contrary it will be a positive marketing tool. And of course that we can compile it accurately and market it appropriately.

I sure hope you can pull it off. The raw data is great, but without attribution, the value of it goes down, obviously. I can see why a book wouldn't want it's name attached, though, unless there were several books involved. I figure if you get 1 or 2 to o.k. it, the rest will follow. It's essentially cheap advertising/branding for them (depending on how you would make a deal for the data). If I'm a small time book, with aspirations to grow, and part of the data - I'd do everything I could to get my name up there... Especially if none of the bigger ones have their names attached. It's just no-brainer business.

The site is amazing. I'm eager to see it grow.

[Pete0]

We are using data from offshore books who have a diverse player base, a solid rating and only deal a single line. That's all we can disclose.

Ofcourse its either 5Dimes or Legendz

Square penetrating books.

Not only that, information is obviously skewed. Many of the games where there is a significantly higher $ volume compared to bet count will be manipulated. This is the age of misinformation. New-age slavery

[ItsMeMrMattE]

Is there a NBA consensus yet? And how do you find the beta consensus on this site. Ive just been going to google and searching sbrforum beta consensus and it brings up links to the NFL consensus and College FB consensus.

[SBR Lou]

Is there a NBA consensus yet? And how do you find the beta consensus on this site. Ive just been going to google and searching sbrforum beta consensus and it brings up links to the NFL consensus and College FB consensus.

There is not yet an NBA Consensus.

You are able to find Consensus from the SBR Odds NFL grid. Here's a direct link: http://www.sportsbookreview.com/betting-odds/consensus/

[ItsMeMrMattE]

Thanks Lou. Big props for putting up any kind of consensus, It can be a great tool. Looking forward to the NBA one.

[ItsMeMrMattE]

Hey Lou, I have a question about something i noticed on the consensus the other day. It said that Vanderbilt had 2,016 bets vs 0 for NCST. $324,576 vs $0. I have a hard time believing that there is a book out there that didnt take a single dollar on NCST. Can you explain how this was posted on the consensus. And also would you ever consider posting a consensus on over/unders as well?

[SBR Lou]

Hey Lou, I have a question about something i noticed on the consensus the other day. It said that Vanderbilt had 2,016 bets vs 0 for NCST. $324,576 vs $0. I have a hard time believing that there is a book out there that didnt take a single dollar on NCST. Can you explain how this was posted on the consensus. And also would you ever consider posting a consensus on over/unders as well?

I'm not sure what you mean on the first part - Consensus only powers NFL currently. If you ever see anything irregular you can grab a screenshot and it will help the feed guys make sense of it.

Yes on considering the totals. That would be a 2 or 3.0 deal.

[ItsMeMrMattE]

http://www.sportsbookreview.com/betting-odds...?date=20121231

[ItsMeMrMattE]

No comment on the link Lou?

[SBR Lou]

http://www.sportsbookreview.com/betting-odds...?date=20121231

No comment on the link Lou?

NFL is the only league consensus supports as of right now. If you're seeing that link available on site vice typing in, let me know and we'll remove it.

[Pick'nParlays]

Ok thx Lou

[Baruch1976]

I don't understand this

Tonight Cowboy game vs Giants shows 70% of money on Giants and almost 350,000 dollars more on the Giants but yet line moved from Dallas -3 to Dallas -3.5

I'm not sure how accurate this can be???

477
478
7:30p
N.Y. Giants
Dallas
+3½ -110
-3½ +100
3,710
4,001
48.11%
51.89%
$667,800
$284,071
70.16%
29.84%
$180
$71
4
3
0
0
0
0