I'm referring to the argument that teams not being able to run means that they can't win.
I've posted this several times before but it seems people have trouble fathoming it. With all of the talking heads on TV talking about it so much, people feel the need to repeat it & the main necessary ingredient for victory or to sound "smart". The fact is, IT IS NOT. NFL is very different than other levels of football in that many NFL QBs can beat you without a running game. All they need is some rushing attempts to set up play action.
Let's look at these FACTS:
-For the 2010 season GB averaged 3.8 yds per carry & Chi 3.9 yet people think Chi is a "running" team.
-The '03 Pats averaged 3.4 yds per carry but that didn't stop them from winning the SB.
-Cincy averaged 7.8 yds per carry in the playoffs last yr.
-The average Super Bowl winner in the 21st century has had just the 18th best ground game.
-GB averaged 3.8 during the regular season which was the same as the Ravens and Falcons who people perceived to be "good" running teams.
-Philly averaged a league best 5.4 yds per carry and we see how that worked out.
-Pitt won their last SB being 4th worst in the league by averaging 3.7 yds per carry in the regular season in '08 and 2.9 in the playoffs that year. Yet people would argue that they are a "tough" running team. lol
-Indy got to the SB averaging just 3.5 last year.
-This year, the SF defense gave up a league 2nd best 3.5 yds per carry and they didn't even have a winning record in the leagues worst division. Car was 7th best. lol
-6 of the top 10 yds per rush defenses failed to make the playoffs this year.
-The last meeting, Chi averaged 5.5 yds per carry and GB averaged 2.6 yet GB won by 7.
I could go on and on with other examples but I think it's clear. It will come down to QB play and turnovers.