 SBR Top-Rated Sportsbooks |
Best Sportsbooks List
|
|
| |||||
| #1 FanDuel | SBR rating 4.8/5 | Review | #6 BetRivers | SBR rating 4.1/5 | Review | #2 Caesars | SBR rating 4.7/5 | Review | #7 Fanatics | SBR rating 4.1/5 | Review |
| #3 DraftKings | SBR rating 4.7/5 | Review | #8 Betway | SBR rating 3.8/5 | Review | ||
| #4 BetMGM | SBR rating 4.6/5 | Review | #9 Borgata | SBR rating 3.5/5 | Review | ||
| #5 bet365 | SBR rating 4.6/5 | Review | #10 ClutchBet | SBR rating 2.9/5 | Review | ||
New England has not won a SINGLE big game since Spygate
Must tell you something...they have choked each and every time since 2006 in their biggest games.
Either they forgot how to score (as in the 2 super bowls) or their D didn't show up and in the loss to Indy in the Championship game in 2007.
Anyway, the window is closing REAL fast on them...
they miss Adam Vinateri
They miss those video camerasOriginally Posted by broadway6
The livestrongs of the nfl.
would today have been a big game?
They beat the Ravens last year with some luck. So not EVERY big game.
I really hope hoody never wins another ring just so the question of how big a part of it Spygate really was can loom over his legacy.
They also haven't had a good defense since they won it 3 out of 4 years
it's tough to play defense when u don't know what plays the offense is gonna call
Not the sane defense
no vinateri
and its spygates fault tyree made the catch of a lifetime. Giants practiced that play daily. If only pats knew it was coming abd taped there practices and walk throughs.
Same with manninghams catch last yr. pats wouldve won if they knew it was coming.
btw fukk pats an giants.
They would have lost last night even if Baltimore was totally
transparent to them, because they don't have the MAN UP power.
Those with small dicks hate on the Pats. Atleast Ray Lewis can kill again at a Super Bowl.
Yeah good call dik like they cant do it with out spy gate they post seasons of 14 13 12 11 wins you dik
Go copy and paste something else Brock maybe EOG will make you a radio star again because of your knowledgeMan they gotta feel like complete smucks for putting you on
I guess after your being caught in copynpastegate they had to be a little red face
Maybe they put you on because of your capping skills? 42% is good even if you were picking -167 as the avg play. GET SOME
That's really not true. For you "big games" are only the finals and etc. And I'm sorry but that's not the case
It's only a big game when you lose, I guess.
Neither have several other teams
Let's not forget how their legacy began. The tuck rule against my beloved Raiders. By far the biggest fix in the history of the NFL. If that play wasn't reversed they don't go to the show that year. Great QB and the rest of the team very average.
I swore I would never put money on them the last 2 losses I incurred. They just looked bad. You have to score more than 1 TD to win a playoff game!
Spygate only helped them win 'big games?'
How come they still win 'non-big games' at a great %?
Playing Buffalo, Miami, and Jets twice a year.
Oh lord more conspiracy/ cheating theories. We hear about cheating more these days because the media is all about it and there are more rats but it's been going on forever and everyone has looked to gain an edge in one form or another. The Pats have not had quite as much success in recent years because the defense is not quite as good. And lets face the facts they lost 2 SB's on a fluke catch by Tyree and a fluke drop by Welka. Buy yourselves a clue people
Fact is they still win 12/14 games a year, multiple playoff wins, and 2 SB appearances.... yeah what a bunch of bums. Getting caught and not being able to use video anymore has really ruined this lousy team
I am not a fan of NE and do agree that spygate did have a hand in their titles. How much no one will ever be able to say with any certainty. However saying they have not won any big games since spygate is incorrect. They made 2 superbowls so I guess those AFC title games were not big games. Yet somehow the two AFC title games they lost are big games? How does that work exactly?
You can if you want state the opinion " Brady/Belichick have not and will not win another superbowl after spy gate" But saying they have not won a big game since spygate just shows your bias against them.
Didn't they have to win some big games to get to those Super Bowls they lost???
this is Brilliant. right on.
unless the cards are marked.. Belichik and Brady can't seem to play Poker very well.
Got ZERO to do with Defense ..if they don't score 28+ points, they lose
Did they score 28 vs the Rams Brock? NO
I'm not a Pats fan obviously. There 1st SB win came at my teams expense in a very controversial game. However the Pats were not exactly blowing teams out in the SB's they did win. Those games were squeeked out and the 2 they lost was du to a lucky catch and unfortunate drop bottom line. I guess the lack of video had something to do with Tyree and Welka? Not saying they did not benefit at all jus saying I see thru the b.s. and the whole thing is overblown.
But Brock ... that is cause .........but they only need 28 cause ....
Just forget it.
Fuk the Pats, But who else has won a lot of their big games since 2006?
The Giants I guess..who else?
Such bullshit the general public was not allowed to see the evidence/tapes and judge for themselves.......Goodell is such a jerkoff to destroy everything, but I think it says something that he chose to do that......They also got fined the most ever in league history and lost a 1st round pick which was unheard of at the time
Their regular season win record is actually better after spygate. Either way it isnt like they are 4-12 every year, they only have missed the playoffs once, people just hate the Pats lol
Reply With Quote
