 SBR Top-Rated Sportsbooks |
Best Sportsbooks List
|
|
| |||||
| #1 FanDuel | SBR rating 4.8/5 | Review | #6 BetRivers | SBR rating 4.1/5 | Review | #2 Caesars | SBR rating 4.7/5 | Review | #7 Fanatics | SBR rating 4.1/5 | Review |
| #3 DraftKings | SBR rating 4.7/5 | Review | #8 Betway | SBR rating 3.8/5 | Review | ||
| #4 BetMGM | SBR rating 4.6/5 | Review | #9 Borgata | SBR rating 3.5/5 | Review | ||
| #5 bet365 | SBR rating 4.6/5 | Review | #10 ClutchBet | SBR rating 2.9/5 | Review | ||
Okay, done!!Originally Posted by gambling god
If you say 10 rosary in a row i forgive you
All hail the gambling god... he's pulling out the tight ones lately!
(But... do not besmirch my given name Capybara again, my lord... else I will summon the powers of he whom you cast out, and forever put a hex on your thread, believe it...)
As long as there is mutual respect in here, we shall all continue to DaNcE and eat CaKe and PRINT MONEY!!!!! And now let us once again DANCE!!!!!
Last edited by Capybara; 12-04-16 at 05:53 PM.
No good. But I lucked out because I took Jack 2nd half to save my arse...lolHow did that work out for you
Wouldn't it be cooler if you were a Gambling Dog? I feel like being a God is so cliche these days. Much more wow factor if you were a Dog that could gamble. Plus when people are like..."Hey you going to take the under dog ?"...someone can reply..."No I'm going to take the Gambling Dog!"
Than people would think i ate dog food instead of a good steak once in a whileWouldn't it be cooler if you were a Gambling Dog? I feel like being a God is so cliche these days. Much more wow factor if you were a Dog that could gamble. Plus when people are like..."Hey you going to take the under dog ?"...someone can reply..."No I'm going to take the Gambling Dog!"
In case you have been living under a rock all i care about is dancing and counting the money so it was written so it shall be done.:lock 2:
PLAY #20 December 6/16 13-6 68% winners +6300.00
California -1.5
Good luck
In case you have been living under a rock the only thing i care about is dancing and counting the money
Incase you were dropped on your head 1 million times as a kid and dont get it yet im gambling god. My 70% winning college basketball season continues Wednesday stay tuned
YTD 14-6 70% winners + 7300.00
My dog would disagree..he eats steaksThan people would think i ate dog food instead of a good steak once in a while
Nice work tonight, Exalted One. 70% is fantastic, keep it up!
Lucky you my dog eats his own poopMy dog would disagree..he eats steaks
Keeping it going is the hard part thanks Capybara
Seems like yesterday i was 2-4 and getting ripped and now on a 14-2 run.How time flies
In case you have been living under a rock all i care about is dancing and counting the money so it was written so it shall be done.
PLAY #21 December 7/16 14-6 70% winners +7300.00
South Dakota -4
In case you have been living under a rock the only thing i care about is dancing and counting the money
Incase you were dropped on your head 1 million times as a kid and dont get it yet im gambling god. My 71% winning college basketball season continues Saturday stay tuned
YTD 15-6 71% winners + 8300.00
If it was truly the only thing you cared about, would it be dancing, or counting the money?
Find it weird that this guy plays ONE play no matter how big the card may be. Not gonna trash the guy. He's hitting a crazy high percentage but 21 plays isn't **** so.... I'll monitor
Agree. Great start. Not sure if he's on bankroll constraint or what. Tiny sample size but so far so good. And these posts are hilarious. Keep it up "gambling god".
Nice HitIncase you were dropped on your head 1 million times as a kid and dont get it yet im gambling god. My 71% winning college basketball season continues Saturday stay tuned
YTD 15-6 71% winners + 8300.00
Would much rather a guy pick his favorite single play of the day than spread it out over 10 plays he kind of likes. Just my personal opinion. The former strategy shows discipline, whereas the latter strategy tells me "action bettor."
Again it depends on how much you are betting. TP bets small amounts. GG says he is doing 1k a clip. If that is the case he can do what he is doing and make his bread. I personally like his style. Single game...go big or go home.
Some people are in for money, some for action, some to prove they can beat the game(ego)
during the course of my life I've been all 3
@ age 31 I finally realize action is overrated and I just want the money
This game is too hard and put in too much work to give back gifts on action plays
you'll see by volume of plays now
of course and lll get drunk and make mistakes but working on that
GG, great fukkin work dude, it's hard to like a guy like you but keep up the winning
A few select games is the way to go to much action is a sure way to fail
Good luck but less plays= less return if you aren't chasing badly
People hate betting a ton of games because they're scared of the juice. They're scared of the juice because they know they have games that aren't strong.
Completely disagree but best of luck give me 3 to 5 solid games a week I'm happy to build a bankroll and grind away rather than shoot for the moon with 50 plays a week
Not sure I'd call it shooting for the moon, more like diversifying. A bad break in a game that week sends you from a solid 3-2 to 2-3 or from 2-3 to 1-4. Lot of risk. I think the ideal number is somewhere in the 20's at least. You can easily find 5-8 games on a Saturday card and then 1-3 games a day depending on how big the card is during the week. If not, you are simply scared IMO. Maybe you REALLY like just 3-5 plays a week but there would def be others that you should be on if you are a good capper. Maybe for 1/3 or 1/4 of your 3-5 plays a week?
He's not betting 1$ per contest... ask anyone here or just monitor the guys who win and lose. Those who bet 1k or even 100$ per play are about quality over quantity and that's how you truly WIN at gambling.
You may have weeks where huge spreadsheets and hundreds of plays net you a few thousand bucks, but betting like that consistently, you WILL chase and you WILL lose. You will read this and deep inside you of all people will know it's the truth.
Not seeking to argue with you and clutter up another winning posters thread so no one can actually see the plays. I'm stating facts that gambling dog and others who are winners know to be true. This is the only response you'll get from me. Please don't clutter the thread
Albeit it takes some growing up to learn the above...like Lkid stated
Agree with TP. Actually it's probably most about figuring out your level of confidence, and being able to adapt. Yesterday I had 4 plays (swept), today I have 0 (don't want to force it). If you figure out your successful confidence level you should bet all the games at or above that level, and in theory more games = higher EV. I hit at about 59% success rate so I'd much rather see that success over 400 plays than 50 plays.
Now as for Saturdays, I have to do my best not to take 30 games I have leans on. I've found my comfort zone of 5-12 plays at a high confidence level on Saturday cards.
So if I only build and sell 5 $5 million dollar houses it isn't as good as 50 $500k houses?
Interesting...
Not true at all. Follow guys that have won at this sport for 20+ years like Alan Boston and they are betting 8+ games a day on weekdays at times. To call gambling dog a winning gambler is kind of embarrassing. Guy has posted like 25 plays so far. Last post from me on the subject. It isn't chasing if you are playing a bunch of guys AT ONE TIME and not just adding stuff left and right after losses like I never do.
His point is limit variance. Pro poker players play every day, and in the online days they'd play 10-20 tables at a time, rather than only play a super deep stack high stakes game on occasion. Why? To limit variance and solidify their edge over higher sample size.
When your $5 million dollar house burns down or something goes wrong which is possible then NO. Much better to be diversified. Finance 101
If your unit size is the same then yes, but if you are doing more games chances are you are doing less on unit size.
Tpowell is more interested being known as the best than to make the most $
too each their own
gl to all
Reply With Quote
