Boston/Indiana UNDER 184.5
( 66.9% / 52.4% ) - 1 = 27.6% edge
Danny G. is having puss drained and will be out for Indy
KELLY BETTORS KEEP YOUR CHIN UP
 SBR Top-Rated Sportsbooks |
Best Sportsbooks List
|
|
| |||||
| #1 FanDuel | SBR rating 4.8/5 | Review | #6 BetRivers | SBR rating 4.1/5 | Review | #2 Caesars | SBR rating 4.7/5 | Review | #7 Fanatics | SBR rating 4.1/5 | Review |
| #3 DraftKings | SBR rating 4.7/5 | Review | #8 Betway | SBR rating 3.8/5 | Review | ||
| #4 BetMGM | SBR rating 4.6/5 | Review | #9 Borgata | SBR rating 3.5/5 | Review | ||
| #5 bet365 | SBR rating 4.6/5 | Review | #10 ClutchBet | SBR rating 2.9/5 | Review | ||
-
03-06-13 01:46 PM #1
i$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$ 66.9% WINNER $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$
-
03-06-13 02:40 PM #2
danny granger being out isn't a good thing for the under....
-
03-06-13 03:20 PM #3
Originally Posted by Shipcity
his absence tonite validates seaon numbers to date (minus a few games) that indicate this number is way too high..
Danny G is still a warmbody scorer, puss & all....no???
-
03-06-13 03:35 PM #4
He is a warm body scorer but is also a pretty good on the ball/perimeter defender
-
03-06-13 03:37 PM #5
At this point in time, no, not in my opinion. I think Orlando Johnson has been a much better option off the bench for them, especially from beyond the arc. I still like the under tho, not saying i don't, i was just jokingly saying i would rather granger play, given how bad he has shot the ball since his return.
-
03-06-13 03:39 PM #6
I think he was a good defender before he was asked to be the primary scorer. His defense isnt what it was his first few years in the league. Originally Posted by jds07v
-
03-06-13 03:41 PM #7
Can you shove any more dollar signs in your thread title?
-
03-06-13 03:49 PM #8
what you say makes good sense from a qualitative standpoint, but it doesn't resolve to a number
my reply would be either:
a) Indy's a top defensive team with or without Danny G
b) they're playing Boston, and there ain't much to defend unless headband Pierce gets lucky
c) the seasoned numbers already reflect Danny G's absence all year, so it's easy to come up with a number on this game
I choose (c) because it's the only one that resolves to a cold hard number.
-
03-06-13 03:50 PM #9
Originally Posted by stevenash
yes, why yes I can
-
03-06-13 03:56 PM #10
wish I had a bonus play in case this one collapses
-
03-06-13 04:04 PM #11
Lakers, basically a must win for them Originally Posted by Aaron McCrevice
wish I had a bonus play in case this one collapses
-
03-06-13 04:12 PM #12 San Antonio, Indiana, Atlanta
I don't see these 3 teams losing. I think SA covers 1st half and Indy/Atlanta wins their games.
3 units on SA 1H and parlay Indy/Atl spreads together for a unit.
-
03-06-13 04:13 PM #13
Explain this to me? Originally Posted by Aaron McCrevice
-
03-06-13 04:13 PM #14
oops...meant to create my own thread. oh well.
-
03-06-13 04:52 PM #15
Originally Posted by stevenash
I predict the total points goes under 184.5 approx. 66.9% of the time. At -110 odds that's a 27.6% edge.
-
03-06-13 05:05 PM #16
my ticket lacks the impressive girth/length that NittanyLionsFan displayed in the NHL forum
GL GENTS
-
03-06-13 05:11 PM #17
Originally Posted by Shipcity
got Lakers capped at -1 in New Orleans
and that's before adjusting to how much worse they actually are ATS
-
03-06-13 05:12 PM #18
Granger is done in indy they'll get rid of him in the summer
-
03-06-13 05:40 PM #19
I like this play as well. GL.
-
03-06-13 06:17 PM #20
started fast Aaron, watch out
-
03-06-13 08:46 PM #21
-
03-06-13 08:48 PM #22
-
03-06-13 08:49 PM #23
-
03-06-13 08:50 PM #24
-
03-06-13 08:50 PM #25
-
03-06-13 08:51 PM #26
-
03-06-13 08:52 PM #27
-
03-06-13 08:53 PM #28
-
03-06-13 08:53 PM #29
Reply With Quote
