where in the op post did he define btcl to be beating the no-vig line but not being arbable? clearly you're MISSING the pt if you think btcl means taking +15 -110 instead of +14.5 -105. no one would be stupid enough to call that btcl, btcl means you're clearly beating the no-vig end line by some measure, at -104 pricing at pinny and -103 pricing at matchbook, clearly you do not need to beat the no-vig closing price much in order to arb.