[stevenash]

Not me, my opponent.

Semi final week.
Final four.

My opponent pretty much has been using Tannehill at QB all season.
Not Johnny Unitias by any stretch, but he's 13th ranked in the NFL, top third. (Better than 5 of the big boys)

For reasons unknown (maybe because it's NE) he sits Tannehill for, wait for it... wait for it....
JOHNNY FOOTBALL.

We don't have to rehash what kind of epic failure of a game Johnny had, do we?
Tannehill goes for 347 yards, 29 for 47 1 TD, 2 picks, not a Hall of Fame game, but good for about 18 points.
Johnny goes 10 for 18 for a whopping 80 yards, 2 picks (should have been 4) 0 TD's, good for about 4 points against a Bengal defense that is not the 1985 Bears, but they are a top 5 defense.

Who sits a steady all season QB in favor for a unproved rookie making his very first NFL start, with an offense that really is not that good against a stout Cincy defense?

You want to get cute in week 3, that's one thing, you don't get cute in the semi finals of a nice money league.

Oh, by the way, I win by 9 points and going to the finals.

[Andy117]

That's a terrible move. Guy deserved to lose.

[yisman]

can't believe someone could be that much of a fanboy that they'd put their playoffs on Manziel

[mpaschal34]

was it timmay who was asking this same question in another thread.