1. #1
    stevenash
    stevenash's Avatar Moderator
    Join Date: 01-17-11
    Posts: 62,659
    Betpoints: 32279

    KC Royals -105 WS game 4 over SF Giants

    Sticking to my original game plan, which is posted out there, Mad-Bum in game 1 and KC to win games 2, 3, and 4.

    Bochy, who knows 100x more baseball than me says Vogelsong's mechanics are straightened out, no need to go to Bumgarner here in game 4.

    That may be true, Vargas is still the better starter.
    SF did slap around Vargas back in August, giving up 2 earned on nine hits.
    Not that it means anything, the only one in the lineup with more than 10 AB's off of Vogelsong is Infante, who is 7 for 11. (The prop bet for Infante getting a hit tonight is yes -170, and I don't lay -170)

    Both pitchers have been in the show for just about a decade each, I don't think there's an experience angle there.
    Vogelsong was big time legit in the 2012 post season, horse crap so far in this post season while Vargas has been hot in October.

    Riding KC once more, not big, KC should be loose as they are playing with house money, SF is the one with their backs big time against the wall, better come out of the gates quick tonight, or they'll be in for a long night.

    Key to the game I believe is SF coming out of the gate hitting, and getting a couple of runs off of Vargas early, if they do that, they'll be fine.

    KC -105 just for 1.5*

  2. #2
    Pauulzcappin
    Pauulzcappin's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 04-23-10
    Posts: 20,295
    Betpoints: 568

    nash im on the other side tonight but best of luck

    how much are we hammering the giants tomorrow for?

  3. #3
    stevenash
    stevenash's Avatar Moderator
    Join Date: 01-17-11
    Posts: 62,659
    Betpoints: 32279

    ^
    The number is going to astronomical, might lay off.

  4. #4
    Pauulzcappin
    Pauulzcappin's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 04-23-10
    Posts: 20,295
    Betpoints: 568

    Quote Originally Posted by stevenash View Post
    ^
    The number is going to astronomical, might lay off.
    -140 but might open -135

  5. #5
    Goat Milk
    Goat Milk's Avatar SBR PRO
    Join Date: 03-24-10
    Posts: 25,838
    Betpoints: 10176

    Vargas is a scrub bro. 2 HRs allowed.

  6. #6
    jjgold
    jjgold's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 07-20-05
    Posts: 388,190
    Betpoints: 10

    I think 90% of posters tonight are on Kansas City

    I will admit SBR posters have been right most of the time with all these later round baseball playoffs

  7. #7
    smitch124
    smitch124's Avatar SBR PRO
    Join Date: 05-19-08
    Posts: 12,564
    Betpoints: 1547

    This line moved a ton, all the $$$ on KC.

  8. #8
    Big Bear
    Love your neighbor
    Big Bear's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 11-01-11
    Posts: 43,253
    Betpoints: 14

    Good Luck Nasty Nash

  9. #9
    BennyBigNuts
    BennyBigNuts's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 04-16-12
    Posts: 8,700
    Betpoints: 1078

    No such thing as playing on house money in MLB playoffs.
    It's not like basketball or hockey.
    Momentum can swing too easily.
    Royals have been loose and ready since game 1 of the regular season.
    Still raging I lost that divisional bet. what a fluke.
    Go Royals!!!!!

  10. #10
    stevenash
    stevenash's Avatar Moderator
    Join Date: 01-17-11
    Posts: 62,659
    Betpoints: 32279

    Quote Originally Posted by Goat Milk View Post
    Vargas is a scrub bro. 2 HRs allowed.
    Dude, did you see the Angel game?l
    First off, for the most part, solo homers are meaningless. I said for the most part, but I'd rather see my starter give up a solo job, than to walk somebody, and allow a rally to start, yeah, Ianetta's homer was a 2 out, nobody on mistake, but hardly earthshaking.
    Freese's solo job was a cheapie, but it did clear the wall.

  11. #11
    stevenash
    stevenash's Avatar Moderator
    Join Date: 01-17-11
    Posts: 62,659
    Betpoints: 32279

    Quote Originally Posted by BennyBigNuts View Post
    No such thing as playing on house money in MLB playoffs.
    It's not like basketball or hockey.
    Momentum can swing too easily.
    Royals have been loose and ready since game 1 of the regular season.
    Still raging I lost that divisional bet. what a fluke.
    Go Royals!!!!!
    I beg to differ with you on sentence 1, but you are entitled to that opinion.

    Tell me about that divisional ticket, and you got a much better price than me.
    You holding any KC to win it all tickets?

  12. #12
    Big Bear
    Love your neighbor
    Big Bear's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 11-01-11
    Posts: 43,253
    Betpoints: 14

    Quote Originally Posted by BennyBigNuts View Post
    No such thing as playing on house money in MLB playoffs.
    It's not like basketball or hockey.
    Momentum can swing too easily.
    Royals have been loose and ready since game 1 of the regular season.
    Still raging I lost that divisional bet. what a fluke.
    Go Royals!!!!!
    let it go Benny. Don't let a bad yesterdat ruin a good today.

  13. #13
    TwoWays
    TwoWays's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 03-24-10
    Posts: 13,145
    Betpoints: 3608

    Might be the lowest rated game ever in sports history with college foots on

  14. #14
    Big Bear
    Love your neighbor
    Big Bear's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 11-01-11
    Posts: 43,253
    Betpoints: 14

    Quote Originally Posted by TwoWays View Post
    Might be the lowest rated game ever in sports history with college foots on
    most def

  15. #15
    stevenash
    stevenash's Avatar Moderator
    Join Date: 01-17-11
    Posts: 62,659
    Betpoints: 32279

    Nice start for 'Song.

  16. #16
    Pauulzcappin
    Pauulzcappin's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 04-23-10
    Posts: 20,295
    Betpoints: 568

    nothing is a cheapy at the A nasher. come on now.

    vogelsong looks good early, lets see what vargas has.

  17. #17
    tatddy
    tatddy's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 03-02-10
    Posts: 10,779
    Betpoints: 608

    Haha stfu Benny you called sf sweep

  18. #18
    stevenash
    stevenash's Avatar Moderator
    Join Date: 01-17-11
    Posts: 62,659
    Betpoints: 32279

    Quote Originally Posted by TwoWays View Post
    Might be the lowest rated game ever in sports history with college foots on
    Because MLB doesn't market their product, it's a shame, they could easily sell this series to the average sports fan.
    MLB thinks they don't have to market their brand, news flash, they do have to.

  19. #19
    laxdjock
    Anyone but the SEC.
    laxdjock's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 09-15-07
    Posts: 4,074
    Betpoints: 12

    Too bad, as the Royals are playing great baseball.

  20. #20
    BennyBigNuts
    BennyBigNuts's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 04-16-12
    Posts: 8,700
    Betpoints: 1078

    Quote Originally Posted by tatddy View Post
    Haha stfu Benny you called sf sweep
    WTF
    I have been rooting for Royals all year as a fan man.
    You aren't around much.
    Just because I thought they were going to lose this series doesn't mean I'm not rooting for them.
    I bet them 7 of the first 8 playoff games, had a division ticket on them, and said in just about every thread all year long and the year before how underrated they are and how they would get there.
    I'm still blaming my division loser on the last day of the season on Twizzle's fukkin airbet mush post.

  21. #21
    Pauulzcappin
    Pauulzcappin's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 04-23-10
    Posts: 20,295
    Betpoints: 568

    vogelsong is retarded

  22. #22
    stevenash
    stevenash's Avatar Moderator
    Join Date: 01-17-11
    Posts: 62,659
    Betpoints: 32279

    That's what speed do.

  23. #23
    Pauulzcappin
    Pauulzcappin's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 04-23-10
    Posts: 20,295
    Betpoints: 568

    please. thats bad defense.

  24. #24
    Pauulzcappin
    Pauulzcappin's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 04-23-10
    Posts: 20,295
    Betpoints: 568

    giants were doing well. now games probably toast.

  25. #25
    stevenash
    stevenash's Avatar Moderator
    Join Date: 01-17-11
    Posts: 62,659
    Betpoints: 32279

    Mooooooose

  26. #26
    stevenash
    stevenash's Avatar Moderator
    Join Date: 01-17-11
    Posts: 62,659
    Betpoints: 32279

    Quote Originally Posted by Pauulzcappin View Post
    please. thats bad defense.
    What set that up before that play?

  27. #27
    Pauulzcappin
    Pauulzcappin's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 04-23-10
    Posts: 20,295
    Betpoints: 568

    Quote Originally Posted by stevenash View Post
    What set that up before that play?
    ya. i agree there. but if he makes that play it's a 1-0 game. that was inexcusable.

    nasher what about leaving vogelsong there to pitch for a guy who hits .700 off him. that was terrible management.

  28. #28
    stevenash
    stevenash's Avatar Moderator
    Join Date: 01-17-11
    Posts: 62,659
    Betpoints: 32279

    ^
    And he's been around, what? Nine seasons, that break should be automatic. How many times as a starter in nine years has he had to cover first? Like 1000000?

  29. #29
    Ra77er
    Ra77er's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 06-20-11
    Posts: 10,969

    Guy really is a baseball genius

  30. #30
    stevenash
    stevenash's Avatar Moderator
    Join Date: 01-17-11
    Posts: 62,659
    Betpoints: 32279

    Vargas with the bags loaded.
    This doesn't end well.

  31. #31
    stevenash
    stevenash's Avatar Moderator
    Join Date: 01-17-11
    Posts: 62,659
    Betpoints: 32279

    Quote Originally Posted by Ra77er View Post
    Guy really is a baseball genius
    Thank you sir.
    Just a student.

  32. #32
    Pauulzcappin
    Pauulzcappin's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 04-23-10
    Posts: 20,295
    Betpoints: 568

    Quote Originally Posted by stevenash View Post
    ^
    And he's been around, what? Nine seasons, that break should be automatic. How many times as a starter in nine years has he had to cover first? Like 1000000?
    yeah it was pathetic. but you are right, speed set it up. i don't think vargas will cough up a 3+ run lead in 4 frames of giants offense. so you probably got this.

    what do you think about game 5? do you think there is a change "big game" shows up?

  33. #33
    stevenash
    stevenash's Avatar Moderator
    Join Date: 01-17-11
    Posts: 62,659
    Betpoints: 32279

    Brett loving Vargas styling

  34. #34
    Pauulzcappin
    Pauulzcappin's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 04-23-10
    Posts: 20,295
    Betpoints: 568

    Quote Originally Posted by stevenash View Post
    Brett loving Vargas styling
    no fukking way that ball caught the corner

  35. #35
    stevenash
    stevenash's Avatar Moderator
    Join Date: 01-17-11
    Posts: 62,659
    Betpoints: 32279

    Quote Originally Posted by Pauulzcappin View Post
    yeah it was pathetic. but you are right, speed set it up. i don't think vargas will cough up a 3+ run lead in 4 frames of giants offense. so you probably got this.

    what do you think about game 5? do you think there is a change "big game" shows up?
    He said to Buck during the dugout Q and A, James figured it out in the BP session.

    I want to back him, not off of his latest outings though.

    Now, if you dangle +150 at me..... I'll bite.

12 Last
Top