Free Picks, sports picks, sports betting websites, sports betting odds, sports betting lines, betting odds, NCAA Football, NCAA Football Predictions, College Football picks, College Football futures, College Football predictions, College Football tips, NCAA Football Picks, NCAA Football Odds, NCAAF previews, free NCAAF picks, College Football picks, College Football betting, College Football odds, College Football betting, sports handicappers, NCAAF picks, NCAAF odds, NCAAF betting, NCAAF predictions, NCAAF Futures
5/18/2014 12:17:00 PM
With the 2014 college football season approaching, we need to take some time and look at the best ways to maximize our bets. Take a look at some of the conditions necessary to make a profit.
The college football off-season is
the time to learn from the previous season(s) in preparation for the next one.
With enough data, the day may come
when we can predict, with profitable consistency, a college football team’s
against-the-spread (ATS) record even before the season begins. While we
continue to research and work for that day, we have discovered some principles
that are helpful in determining which teams are likely to have good and bad ATS
Expectations play such a big role
in setting college football point spreads and odds (linemaking). Based on our research, if we were to create
the ideal conditions for a college football team’s profitable ATS season, then we
would want the team to:
be unranked by any preseason polls,
have been unprofitable the prior ATS season,
increase their straight-up (SU) wins from the
To provide concrete examples of these desirable conditions,
look no further than the Southeastern Conference (the SEC) in 2013. The two SEC
teams with the best ATS records in 2013 were Auburn, 12-2 ATS, and Missouri,
Neither team was ranked in the AP (Associated
Press) Top 25 Preseason Poll- the most prestigious and famous preseason college
In 2012 (the prior season), Auburn was 4-8 ATS
and Missouri was 5-7 ATS. Obviously, both teams had unprofitable ATS seasons.
Auburn increased their SU wins from 3 in 2012 to
12 in 2013. Missouri increased their SU wins from 5 in 2012 to 12 in 2013.
If we were to create the ideal
conditions for a college football team to have a poor ATS season, then we would
want the team to:
have a high pre-season ranking,
have been profitable the prior ATS season,
decrease their SU wins from the prior season.
To provide concrete examples of the undesirable conditions, once
again, look no further than the SEC in 2013. No two SEC teams had more
unprofitable ATS seasons in 2013 than Georgia, 3-9-1 ATS, and Florida, 4-8 ATS.
Both teams were ranked in the AP Top 25
Preseason Poll. Georgia was fifth and Florida was tenth.
In 2012 (the prior season), Georgia was 7-6 ATS,
and Florida was 7-5 ATS. While those ATS records are not going to make
bookmakers shiver, they were both profitable.
From 2012 to 2013, Georgia decreased their SU
wins from 12 to 8, while Florida decreased their SU wins from 11 to 4.
Lessons for the
Knowing that two out of the three
conditions can be determined before the season starts, begin your search for your
ideal college football picks this off-season. In researching potentially successful
ATS teams, look for those NOT listed in the AP Top 25 Preseason Poll. That poll
is usually released in mid-August, still giving you a couple off-season weeks
Look through the 2013 ATS records
for all FBS teams, and look to the teams that had unprofitable ATS seasons. In
2013, nine teams beat the spread at least 75% of the time. Their combined ATS
record was 91-26-2 (77.78%). Putting that into perspective, the bettor who
wagered $110 to win $100 on every game those nine teams played in 2013 would
have profited $6,240. Of those same nine tremendously successful 2013 teams,
only ONE had a profitable prior (2012) season. The combined 2012 ATS record for
those same nine teams was 48-62 (43.64%). Putting that into perspective once
again, those nine teams that made $6,240 for $100-bettors in 2013, lost $2,020
Looking to satisfy that third
condition, an increase in SU wins from the prior season looks more artful than
scientific; however, you would be wise to look for teams with significant room
for SU-win growth. In other words, do not start your search for 2014’s perfect
ATS candidate with 2013’s undefeated Florida State. Following these principles,
if you can find a group of desirable teams to bet on, and a group of
undesirable teams to bet against, then history suggests that you are on your
way to a profitable college football season- even before it begins.